The Estimate Review Audit

The Estimate Review is a $12,000 fixed-price written analysis of your estimating process: scope-gap exposure and repeated error patterns, read across three of your recent bids. A PDF within 5 business days; pays for itself on a single $7K scope miss.

$12,000 one-time · 5 business days

An estimator on a public construction thread missed a $7K mobilization cost on an $850K bid because the close was rushed and the review was manual. One miss is over half this audit fee.

Where bids leak margin

Most estimating errors are not math errors. They are scope gaps, items that were implicitly in-scope in the field but never made it into the number. By the time the gap surfaces, the contract is signed and the cost is yours.

The pattern repeats across project types and firm sizes. An operator running lean rarely has time to review three bids side by side and notice which categories they consistently undercount. The errors compound across projects without a name.

What this can recover

A junior estimator on a public construction thread described missing a $7K mobilization cost on an $850K bid because the close was rushed and the review was manual. One miss is over half this audit fee.

At the operational level, contractors widely report that a 1% lift in bid accuracy moves $50,000 on a $5M shop and $250,000 on a $25M shop. The audit names the scope categories your bids consistently undercount: the patterns that compound across every bid you submit until they get a name.

What you send

Three recent bids, varied in scope if possible. A short description of how you build estimates, your process, the software you use, how you handle allowances and exclusions. No dollar amounts attached to client names are required; bid descriptions and line structures are sufficient.

What you get back

A written PDF analysis identifying scope-gap exposure patterns across the three samples, recurring error categories specific to how you estimate, and process recommendations for closing the gaps. Delivered within 5 business days of intake.

Who this is for

Solo GCs, small firms, and specialty subs running lean estimating, typically without a dedicated estimator reviewing the work. Most useful if you have noticed margin eroding on jobs that should have been profitable, or if you are scaling bid volume and want a second set of eyes on the process before the errors scale with it.

Credited toward a Build

If you act on what this audit finds, the full fee is credited toward a Datumel Build, where we install the fix (automations, a tuned assistant, or a configured workbook) directly into your own tools. The audit is the map; the Build is the work.

$12,000 one-time

Pays for itself on a single $7K scope miss.

This audit is currently under construction and we are gauging demand. Join the waitlist to be first to know when it becomes bookable.

Questions people ask first

Your estimating process across three to six recent bids. Where your bid template hides ambiguity, where scope gets undercounted, which specific phrases your subs read differently than the GC does. The audit names the language patterns showing up on bids you lose AND on jobs that go over.

Because takeoff is a quantity-counting problem (Datumel doesn't read plan PDFs and produce quantities; that's a different hard problem). Bidding is a process problem, how the bid is structured, what gets included by default, what gets excluded, how addenda get folded in. Process gaps are where the audit finds margin.

Three to six recent bids you've submitted on real jobs (redacted is fine), a written description of your estimating process, and your bid template. We don't need bid totals, customer names, or signed contracts.

PDF in your inbox within 5 business days of the intake form. One round of clarifying questions if anything is ambiguous, the clock pauses until you reply.

$12,000 one-time. Subs and small GCs have publicly described missing $7K-scale scope items on individual bids; the audit is priced to pay for itself on the next two cycles where it surfaces a gap before bid day rather than after.