Before the first payment application goes out, the contract sum gets broken into line items — sitework, foundations, framing, MEP rough-in, and so on — each with a dollar value that adds up to the total contract price. Every pay app after that references percent complete against these lines, not the contract as a whole.
A poorly built SOV causes billing problems long before the job is done. Front-load a line item too aggressively and it looks like fraud to the owner's rep; under-value one and the contractor is financing work out of pocket before they can bill for it.
Example
A GC breaks a $2M contract into 40 SOV lines. At month three, framing shows 60% complete on the pay app — a number the super and PM agree on before it goes to the owner's rep, because a disputed percentage on one line item can hold up the entire payment.
Related terms
Next step
Where this shows up in Datumel:
Job-Costing Workbook InstallFrom $6,000 one-time
A configured job-costing workbook in your own Sheets or Airtable: cost codes, estimate-versus-actual, WIP, and over/under billing, with training to run it.